| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Chances a cross-compiler will find a working crt*.o
in /usr/lib are more or less 0.
Signed-off-by: Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
PS: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20101122/112576.html
This is fix PR8686 for llvm: accepting a 'b' suffix at the end
of all the setcc instructions.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Try "tcc -E -c tccasm.c -o tccasm.o"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a ".i" extension as alias for ".c"
GCC and file extensions:
.i C source code which should not be preprocessed.
Before a patch:
./tcc -E tccasm.c -o tccasm.i
./tcc -c tccasm.i -o tccasm.o
tccasm.i:1: error: unrecognized file type
|
| |
|
|
| |
gcc complain but work right and tcc simply fail to compile right.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* tccpp.c (parse_number): `shift' should be 1 while parsing binary
floating point number.
* tests/tests2/70_floating_point_literals.c: New test cases for
floating point number parsing.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The memory needed by `buffer' will be allocated in `tcc_open_bf',
these is no need to allocate them in BufferedFile statically.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
After leaving the code block that `buf' is defined, `buf' will not
exist, so `name' will point to a variable that does not exist.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This includes windows.h to fix a warning about
an implicit function usage of ExitProcess().
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
test case:
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
struct _s { unsigned a:9, b:5, c:7; } _s, *s = &_s;
int n = 250;
s->a = s->b = s->c = n + 4;
printf("--> %d / %d / %d\n", s->a, s->b, s->c);
return 0;
}
before:
--> 254 / 30 / 126
now:
--> 30 / 30 / 126
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't override CPPFLAGS so that it can be passed through the
environment.
(This is a patch Thomas Preud'homme wrote for Debian in February 2013.)
|
| |
|
|
| |
This fixes compilation on (k)FreeBSD.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Clear CFLAGS and LDFLAGS to build the tests, in case the main Makefile
passes some flags that aren't handled by tcc (we are not compiling tcc
here, we are using tcc to compile the tests).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prevent libtcc1.a to be compiled with -fstack-protector-strong, so that
linking with tcc doesn't fail because symbol '__stack_chk_fail_local' is
not present in libtcc1.a. This is useful only if the CFLAGS passed from
the main Makefile contain this flag.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This for example suppresses string constants such as with
int main()
{
return sizeof "foo";
}
Actually, setting
nocode_wanted = 1;
in libtcc.c for the initial global level seemed wrong, since
obviously "nocode_wanted" means code as any side effects, also
such as string constants.
This reverts a part of 2de1b2d14cc920e2c698ff0086f5558c2da7f569
(documented as "Some in-between fixes" in Changelog)
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
untouched, also argc. Added a if checking the result of it.
|
| |
|
|
| |
DWORD boundary and it becomes 0x80000000. Jle treats as -214783648, but Jbe treats as 214783648. Thanks to Jason Hood for explain me this.
|
| |
|
|
| |
handler function, when try to allocate INT_MAX. Patch provided by Jason Hood in private e-mail, when I ask to him for help. He say: Feel free to pass it on to the mailing list.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
68_macro_concat.c -> 68_macro_param_list_err_1.c
69_macro_concat.c -> 69_macro_param_list_err_2.c
and Remove spaces
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
#define hexCh(c (c >= 10 ? 'a' + c - 10 : '0' + c)
hexCh(c);
out:
jiang@jiang:~/test$ ./tcc -E c4.c
# 1 "c4.c"
(c >= 10 ? 'a' + c - 10 : '0' + c);
---------------------------------------------------------------
#define hexCh(c/3) (c >= 10 ? 'a' + c - 10 : '0' + c)
hexCh(c);
out:
jiang@jiang:~/test$ ./tcc -E c4.c
# 1 "c4.c"
/3) (c >= 10 ? 'a' + c - 10 : '0' + c);
jiang@jiang:~/test$
after patch:
# 1 "c4.c"
c4.c:1: error: may not appear in macro parameter list: "("
jiang@jiang:~/test$
jiang@jiang:~/test$ ./tcc -E c4.c
# 1 "c4.c"
c4.c:1: error: may not appear in macro parameter list: "/"
jiang@jiang:~/test$
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Starting early April, a number of commits were pushed to the mob branch
that did not reflect the interest, wishes, or code quality of the tcc
community. This commit reverts those commits, while cherry-picking
grishka's commit for win64 linkage issues.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
"-l" option"
This reverts commit 7a3f6d49415fd5f1fa99d25aba40c7884d5774a4.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
example: "-lshell32" will try "shell32.def + shell32.c"
Add lib type "%s/%s.c" for tcc_add_library() ('-l' option parse)
So tcc can use all files as scripts.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
At the same time, increase the GCC style warning
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
int main()
{
int a[10] = {[5]=5};
return 0;
}
Disassembly of section .text:
0000000000000000 <main>:
0: 55 push %rbp
1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
4: 48 81 ec 30 00 00 00 sub $0x30,%rsp
b: b8 05 00 00 00 mov $0x5,%eax
10: 89 45 ec mov %eax,-0x14(%rbp)
13: 48 b8 14 00 00 00 00 movabs $0x14,%rax
1a: 00 00 00
1d: 49 89 c2 mov %rax,%r10
20: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
25: 48 89 c6 mov %rax,%rsi
28: 48 8d 45 d8 lea -0x28(%rbp),%rax
2c: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi
2f: 4c 89 d2 mov %r10,%rdx
32: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
37: e8 fc ff ff ff callq 38 <main+0x38>
3c: 48 b8 10 00 00 00 00 movabs $0x10,%rax
43: 00 00 00
46: 49 89 c2 mov %rax,%r10
49: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
4e: 48 89 c6 mov %rax,%rsi
51: 48 8d 45 f0 lea -0x10(%rbp),%rax
55: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi
58: 4c 89 d2 mov %r10,%rdx
5b: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
60: e8 fc ff ff ff callq 61 <main+0x61>
65: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
6a: e9 00 00 00 00 jmpq 6f <main+0x6f>
6f: c9 leaveq
70: c3 retq
After the patch
0000000000000000 <main>:
0: 55 push %rbp
1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
4: 48 81 ec 30 00 00 00 sub $0x30,%rsp
b: 48 b8 28 00 00 00 00 movabs $0x28,%rax
12: 00 00 00
15: 49 89 c2 mov %rax,%r10
18: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
1d: 48 89 c6 mov %rax,%rsi
20: 48 8d 45 d8 lea -0x28(%rbp),%rax
24: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi
27: 4c 89 d2 mov %r10,%rdx
2a: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
2f: e8 fc ff ff ff callq 30 <main+0x30>
34: b8 05 00 00 00 mov $0x5,%eax
39: 89 45 ec mov %eax,-0x14(%rbp)
3c: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
41: e9 00 00 00 00 jmpq 46 <main+0x46>
46: c9 leaveq
47: c3 retq
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"c5.c"
int main()
{
// union st
struct st
{
char c;
short s;
// char cc[];
};
// union st
struct st
ss = { 1, 2, 3};
// int a = ss;
char cb[1] = {1,2,3};
return 0;
}
c5.c:12: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
c5.c:14: warning: excess elements in array initializer
c5.c:14: warning: excess elements in array initializer
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
I was busy recently, forget test. Thank Austin
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
For example:
#define TOK_ASM_weak TOK_WEAK1
#define TOK_ASM_weak TOK_WEAK
Output:
C8.c:3: warning: TOK_ASM_weak redefined
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
{
struct st {
int aa:16;
int bb:16;
} s;
s.aa = 1;
s.bb = 2;
return 0;
}
objdump -d:
elf64-x86-64
Disassembly of section .text:
0000000000000000 <main>:
0: 55 push %rbp
1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
4: 48 81 ec 10 00 00 00 sub $0x10,%rsp
b: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax
10: 48 89 c1 mov %rax,%rcx
13: 81 e1 ff ff 00 00 and $0xffff,%ecx
19: 8b 55 fc mov -0x4(%rbp),%edx
1c: 81 e2 00 00 ff ff and $0xffff0000,%edx
22: 09 d1 or %edx,%ecx
24: 89 4d fc mov %ecx,-0x4(%rbp)
27: b8 02 00 00 00 mov $0x2,%eax
2c: 48 89 c1 mov %rax,%rcx
2f: 81 e1 ff ff 00 00 and $0xffff,%ecx
35: c1 e1 10 shl $0x10,%ecx
38: 8b 55 fc mov -0x4(%rbp),%edx
3b: 81 e2 ff ff 00 00 and $0xffff,%edx
41: 09 d1 or %edx,%ecx
43: 89 4d fc mov %ecx,-0x4(%rbp)
46: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
4b: e9 00 00 00 00 jmpq 50 <main+0x50>
50: c9 leaveq
51: c3 retq
After the patch
Disassembly of section .text:
0000000000000000 <main>:
0: 55 push %rbp
1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
4: 48 81 ec 10 00 00 00 sub $0x10,%rsp
b: 8b 45 fc mov -0x4(%rbp),%eax
e: 81 e0 00 00 ff ff and $0xffff0000,%eax
14: 83 c8 01 or $0x1,%eax
17: 89 45 fc mov %eax,-0x4(%rbp)
1a: 8b 45 fc mov -0x4(%rbp),%eax
1d: 81 e0 ff ff 00 00 and $0xffff,%eax
23: 81 c8 00 00 02 00 or $0x20000,%eax
29: 89 45 fc mov %eax,-0x4(%rbp)
2c: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax
31: e9 00 00 00 00 jmpq 36 <main+0x36>
36: c9 leaveq
37: c3 retq
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
does not define can be macro_push.
And the modified tcctest.c test
2, pack: in the compiler under the mode of s1->ppfp, I have no clear ideas1->ppfp
Some advice thank you Roy to me.This patch, I hope I can pass the Roy test
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
first clean up
|